A group of Finnish soldiers talk amongst one another near a Finnish Sisu NA-110 tracked vehicle on May 27, 2026 at Vuosanka Training Area, Finland. From April 27 to May 31, 2026 U.S. and Allied forces will exercise NATO’s Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative, demonstrating NATO’s ability to fight and win on the modern battlefield. Nearly 15,000 troops from eleven nations will train across the High North, Baltic region, and Poland, executing rapid maneuvers, air defense, counter-drone operations, and cyber defense to validate NATO’s regional defense plans in real time. This series of linked exercises, including Saber Strike, Immediate Response, and Swift Response, turns investment into capability. Soldiers integrate unmanned systems, AI-enabled command and control, and live data networks to move faster, decide faster, and fight more effectively across all domains. Sword 26 demonstrates how U.S. Army Europe and Africa drives transformation at scale while strengthening deterrence. Together with our Allies, we are building a unified, lethal force ready to defend NATO territory and respond to any threat. (U.S. Army Reserve photo by 1st Sgt. Austin Berner)

Finnish military officers have warned that outdated combat methods still dominate conscript training and that some of the tactics being taught would not work on a modern battlefield. Officers interviewed anonymously by Helsingin Sanomat argue that Finnish infantry and mechanised units remain too reliant on concentrating hundreds of soldiers for movement and attacks, formations that can now be easily detected and targeted by drones.

The article has sparked major discussions in Finnish military circles. The Finnish Army’s head of training, Colonel Mikko Saarelainen, said the criticism is partly justified, acknowledging that troops need to become capable of operating in smaller, more dispersed groups.

The officers blame the slow adaptation on a conservative institutional culture, inadequate drone equipment and the short duration of conscript service. They say the drones currently available for exercises are poorly suited to realistic training and are not being used appropriately. Several officers consequently argue that conscripts should serve longer to allow new methods to be properly taught, while established training practices and resistance to change further slow the adoption of lessons from contemporary drone warfare.

Read the entire piece in Yle.